Two-dimensional gain cross-grating based on spatial modulation of active Raman gain
Wang Li1, 2, Zhou Feng-Xue1, Guo Hong-Ju3, Niu Yue-Ping1, Gong Shang-Qing1, †,
Department of Physics, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China
School of Physics and Electronics Engineering, Nanyang Normal College, Nanyang 473061, China
Shanghai Publishing and Printing College, Shanghai 200093, China

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: sqgong@ecust.edu.cn

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11274112 and 11347133).

Abstract
Abstract

Based on the spatial modulation of active Raman gain, a two-dimensional gain cross-grating is theoretically proposed. As the probe field propagates along the z direction and passes through the intersectant region of the two orthogonal standing-wave fields in the xy plane, it can be effectively diffracted into the high-order directions, and the zero-order diffraction intensity is amplified at the same time. In comparison with the two-dimensional electromagnetically induced cross-grating based on electromagnetically induced transparency, the two-dimensional gain cross-grating has much higher diffraction intensities in the first-order and the high-order directions. Hence, it is more suitable to be utilized as all-optical switching and routing in optical networking and communication.

1. Introduction

Based on electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT),[13] electromagnetically induced grating (EIG) is formed and has been investigated widely.[410] By replacing the coupling field with a standing wave, alternating regions of high transmission and absorption can be created, acting as a grating on which the probe beam can be diffracted. As shown in Ref. [4], when the probe field is resonant with the related states, EIG is a kind of amplitude grating which tends to diffract light into the central maximum, and the high-order diffraction efficiency is very low. If a high efficiency is desired for the high-order diffraction directions, detuning should be introduced. The detuning can cause a phase modulation to the probe beam and the formed phase grating then disperses energy into the high-order directions. However, the detuning gives rise to large absorption and the whole diffraction efficiency is lowered accordingly. Alternatively, electromagnetically induced phase grating (EIPG) based on the giant Kerr nonlinearity has been proposed to improve the first-order diffraction efficiency.[11,12] In the EIPG, a π cross-phase modulation across the probe beam with low energy loss has been accomplished. Furthermore, the effects of microwave modulation,[13] spontaneous generated coherence,[14,15] and static magnetic field[16] have also been considered to achieve improved diffraction efficiency in the first-order direction.

On the other hand, in the active Raman gain (ARG) systems, the probe field can be amplified and some related studies have been reported, such as superluminal light propagation,[1719] ultraslow propagation,[20] rapidly responding nonlinear effects,[2123] etc. A kind of gain grating that is based on the spatial modulation of ARG has also been proposed.[2426] This kind of gain grating not only amplifies the zero-order diffraction intensity but it also effectively diffracts light into the high-order directions.

In our previous work, we have proposed a scheme for a two-dimensional electromagnetically induced cross-grating (EICG) based on EIT in a four-level tripod-type atomic system.[27] As two standing-wave fields along the x and y directions drive their corresponding atomic transitions, a two-dimensional EICG is created and diffracts light into the high-order directions. In order to improve the diffraction efficiency of the two-dimensional grating, in this paper we theoretically investigate a two-dimensional gain cross-grating (GCG) in a cold atomic medium, taking advantage of ARG. As the probe field propagates along the z direction and passes through the intersectant region of the two orthogonal standing-wave fields in the xy plane, it can be significantly diffracted into the first-order direction and the zero-order diffraction intensity is also amplified. In contrast with the two-dimensional EICG, the first-order diffraction intensity of the two-dimensional GCG is greatly enhanced.

2. Atomic model and diffraction intensity distribution

We consider a four-level N-type cold atomic system as shown in Fig. 1(a). A Raman field with Rabi frequency Ωr drives the transition |3〉 ↔ |1〉. A weak probe field with Rabi frequency Ωp(z) couples to the transition |3〉 ↔ |2〉. The transition |4〉 ↔ |2〉 is driven by a standing-wave field with position-dependent Rabi frequency Ωs(x, y). As shown in Fig. 1(b), the standing-wave field Ωs(x, y) is the combination of two orthogonal standing-wave fields with the same frequency, that is Ωs(x, y) = Ωs0[sin(πx/Λx) + sin(πy/Λy)], where Ωs0 is assumed to be real for simplicity, and Λx and Λy are the standing-wave field’s spatial periods in the x and y directions, respectively. The probe field propagates along the z direction and passes through the intersectant region of the two orthogonal standing-wave fields in the xy plane, while the Raman field may propagate along an arbitrary direction.

Fig. 1. (a) Schematic diagram of the four-level N-type atomic system. The possible levels correspond to the hyperfine levels of 85Rb atoms: |5S1/2, F = 3, m = −3〉 = |1〉, |5S1/2, F = 2, m = −1〉 = |2〉, |5P1/2, F = 2, m = −2〉 = |3〉, and |5P3/2, F = 1, m = 0〉 = |4〉. (b) Sketch of a prototype.

In the interaction picture, with the rotating-wave approximation and the electric-dipole approximation, the Hamiltonian is given by

where Δp, Δr, and Δs are the detunings of the probe field, the Raman field, and the standing-wave field, respectively. Here we consider the far-off-resonant Raman transitions, namely, Δr and Δp are much larger than the Rabi frequencies and the decay rates, and all of the atoms populate at the ground state |1〉(ρ ≈ 1) at the very beginning. By using the Liouville equation, we obtain the related density-matrix equations as follows:

where γi j is the atomic decay rate between levels |i〉 and |j〉. Under the weak-field approximation, we can obtain the steady-state solution ρ32 and then the linear susceptibility χ,[24]

where N and λp represent the atomic density and the wavelength of the probe field, respectively.

In order to obtain the diffraction pattern for the probe field propagating through the medium, we begin with the Maxwell’s equation. Under the slowly varying envelope approximation and in the steady-state regime, the propagation of the probe field driven by the atomic polarization can be described as

We assume that the interaction length of the cold atoms experienced by the probe field in the z direction is L. By solving Eq. (4), the transmission function for an interaction length L of the medium can be obtained as

where the first and the second terms correspond to the gain (−Im[χ]L) and the phase modulation (Φ = Re[χ]L). By performing the Fourier transformation on the transmission function and using the Fraunhofer diffraction theory, we obtain the Fraunhofer diffraction intensity distribution

where M and N are the numbers of the spatial periods along the x and y axes of the grating illuminated by the probe beam, and θ1 and θ2 are the diffraction angles with respect to the x and y axes, respectively. Here the Fraunhofer diffraction of a single space period is

The diffraction efficiency of the grating is taken to be the ratio of the intensity in the diffracted output to the intensity of the input. The probe diffraction intensity Ip(θ1, θ2) is normalized so that if T(x, y) = 1, then Ip(θ1, θ2) = 1. The n-order diffraction efficiency is determined by Eq. (6) with sin θ1 = p/Λx in the x axis and sinθ2 = p/Λy in the y axis.

3. Results and discussion

In this section, we demonstrate the two-dimensional gain cross-grating and analyze the controllability of the diffraction efficiency. We assume γ31 = γ32 = γ41 = γ42 = γ, γ12 = 10−3 γ with γ being the natural linewidth of state |3〉. L is given in units of Figure 2(a) displays the amplitude of the transmission function as a function of x and y. This shows that the probe field is amplified and the probe gain oscillates along the x and y directions in the periods of Λx and Λy, respectively. As shown in Ref. [24], the amplification of the probe field is attributed to the effect of ARG induced by the Raman field, and the probe gain is periodically changed due to the periodic intensity pattern of the standing wave in the xy plane. In Fig. 2(b), we describe the normalized Fraunhofer diffraction intensity according to the transmission function of Fig. 2(a). An investigation of Fig. 2(b) shows that the probe field is not only amplified in the zero-order direction but also distributes significantly into the high-order directions. The first-order diffraction efficiency can approach 22%, which is much higher than that (2%) of the two-dimensional EICG.[27] Meanwhile, the dispersion of the probe field also changes periodically, and then the phase modulation of the probe field occurs along the x and y directions, as shown in Fig. 2(c). When the phase modulation is considered, a fraction of the zero-order diffraction intensity will deflect into the high-order directions and the first-order diffraction efficiency approaches to 24%, as shown in Fig. 2(d). In comparison with the two-dimensional EICG,[27] due to the ARG, the two-dimensional GCG has a much high diffraction intensity in the first-order direction.

Fig. 2. The amplitude |T(x, y)|(a) and the phase Φ/π (c) of the transmission function as a function of x (in units of Λx) and y (in units of Λy). (b) The normalized diffraction intensity Ip(θ1,θ2) as a function of sin(θ1) and sin(θ2) for the corresponding transmission function shown in panel (a). (d) The two-dimensional gain cross-grating considers the gain and phase modulation. The insets in panels (b) and (d) show the residual parts of the diffraction patterns along sin(θ1). The parameters are Ωr = 0.2γ, Ωs0 = 0.2γ, Δr = Δp = 80γ, Δs = 100γ, Λx/λp = Λy/λp = 4, L = 200ξ, and M = N = 5.

In order to meet the requirement of ARG that most atoms populate in the ground state |1〉, we ensure that Δr and Δp are much larger than the Rabi frequencies and the atomic decay rates. Under this condition, we investigate the controllability of the first-order diffraction intensity of the two-dimensional GCG. Figure 3(a) depicts the effects of the Raman field’s Rabi frequency on the first-order diffraction intensity. It is found that the first-order diffraction intensity increases with the increase of Ωr, which is consistent with the one-dimensional gain-phase grating.[24] This can be explained by the gain and phase modulation as shown in Figs. 3(b) and 3(c). When the Raman field’s Rabi frequency is small, the gain and phase modulation induced by the standing-wave field are not obvious due to the small probe gain and dispersion. With the increase of Ωr, the probe gain and dispersion increase, which enlarges the gain and phase modulation depth and makes more light available for diffraction into the first-order direction. However, in our scheme, the Raman field’s Rabi frequency cannot be set too large since the weak-field approximation for the probe field is applied in our numerical simulation. If the Raman field’s Rabi frequency is too large, then the probe field will be amplified greatly and even exceed the other two fields. So we chose Ωr = 0.2γ in the following simulations.

Fig. 3. (a) The first-order diffraction intensity or as a function of Ωr. (b) The amplitude and (c) the phase of the transmission function in the x direction for different Ωr at y = 0. The other parameters are the same as those in Fig. 2.

Figure 4(a) displays the first-order diffraction intensity as a function of Ωs0. At small Ωs0, the first-order diffraction intensity increases with Ωs0. This is within our expectation. As shown in Figs. 4(b) and 4(c), with the increase of Ωs0, the gain and dispersion are gradually enhanced at the individual antinodes, which increases the gain and phase modulation depth. As a result, more light can be diffracted into the first-order direction. However, the first-order diffraction intensity peaks at a certain Ωs0 (Ωs0 = 0.2γ) beyond which it fades away. As Ωs0 increases further and exceeds 0.2γ, the phase modulation is always increased (see Fig. 4(c)) but the gain is gradually decreased at the individual antinodes and the gain modulation depth is also decreased, as shown in Fig. 4(b). So, light available for diffraction is reduced, and the first-order diffraction intensity decreases as Ωs0 > 0.2γ (see Fig. 4(a)). At the same time, we also investigate the effect of the interaction length L on the first-order diffraction intensity. It is obvious that the first-order diffraction intensity will increase with the increase of the interaction length L. In order to meet the actual experiment condition and the weak-field approximation of the probe field, the appropriate interaction length we chosen is L = 230ξ, which leads to an amplification of the probe field by a factor of four.[24] Therefore, due to the ARG, the two-dimensional GCG has a much high diffraction intensity in the first-order direction, and it has a great potential to be used as all-optical switching and routing[28] in optical networking and communication.

Fig. 4. (a) The first-order diffraction intensity or as a function of Ωs0. (b) The amplitude and (c) the phase of the transmission function in the x direction for different Ωs0 at y = 0. The other parameters are the same as those in Fig. 2.
4. Conclusion

We theoretically demonstrate a two-dimensional GCG based on the spatial modulation of active Raman gain and dispersion in a four-level N-type cold atomic system. It is shown that not only the zero-order diffraction intensity is amplified but the first-order diffraction efficiency is also improved. As can be seen, it is mainly the probe gain that contributes to the gain modulation, while the phase modulation further improves the first-order and the high-order diffraction intensities. In comparison with the two-dimensional EICG, the two-dimensional GCG has much high diffraction intensities in the first-order and the high-order directions. Thus it may be utilized as all-optical switching and routing, which are important optical devices in optical networking and communication.

Reference
1HarrisS E 1997 Phys. Today 50 36
2YanX BGuK HFuC BCuiC LWuJ H 2014 Chin. Phys. 23 114201
3ZhangJZhangSOuB QWuWChenP X 2014 Chin. Phys. 23 113701
4LingH YLiY QXiaoM 1998 Phys. Rev. 57 1338
5MitsunagaMImotoN 1999 Phys. Rev. 59 4773
6CardosoG CTabosaJ W R 2002 Phys. Rev. 65 033803
7DuttaB KMahapatraP K 2006 J. Phys. 39 1145
8DongY BGuoY H 2014 Chin. Phys. 23 074204
9YuSLiaoPYangZ YGuW Y2013Acta Phys. Sin.6222425(in Chinese)
10ZhouF XQiY HSunHChenD JYangJNiuY PGongS Q 2013 Opt. Express 21 12249
11de AraujoL E E 2010 Opt. Lett. 35 977
12LiuYWangPPengS Y 2013 Chin. Phys. 22 104203
13XiaoZ HShinS GKimK 2010 J. Phys. 43 161004
14WanR GKouJJiangLJiangYGaoJ Y 2011 Phys. Rev. 83 033824
15XieBCaiXXiaoZ H 2012 Opt. Commun. 285 133
16BaNWuX YLiuX JZhangS QWangJ 2012 Opt. Commun. 285 3792
17WangL JKuzmichADogariuA 2000 Nature 406 277
18PayneM GDengL 2001 Phys. Rev. 64 031802
19AgarwalG SDasguptaS 2004 Phys. Rev. 70 023802
20JiangK JDengLPayneM G 2006 Phys. Rev. 74 041803
21DengLPayneM G 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 253902
22JiangK JDengLHagleyE WPayneM G 2008 Phys. Rev. 77 045804
23HangCHuangG X 2010 Opt. Express 18 2952
24KuangS QJinC SLiC 2011 Phys. Rev. 84 033831
25KuangS Q 2012 Chin. Opt. 5 464
26KuangS QYangH G 2013 J. Opt. Soc. Am. 30 136
27WangLZhouF XHuP DNiuY PGongS Q 2014 J. Phys. B:At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 47 225501
28HamB S 2004 Appl. Phys. Lett. 85 893